Thursday, 9 January 2014

Please Pay For Your Lunch At The Counter (Before You Slink Out the Back)

.
I read a blurp over at I Own The World about a politician, Jennifer Wexton, comparing Tea Party Republicans to violent rapists. Then she went on to proclaim her own unquestionable virtue for defending a woman's "right" to choose.

"After describing women being assaulted and "traumatized again by facing the criminal in court," Wexton made this declaration: "...as a prosecutor I put violent offenders in prison. In the Virginia Senate, I'll fight just as hard against Tea Party Republicans who would take away a woman's healthcare and her right to choose, even in cases of rape and incest.""

Of course, the Tea Party doesn't really want to take away a woman's healthcare - they just want to make her pay for it herself rather than force others to pay. And nobody, I mean nobody, touches "a woman's right to choose" with a ten foot barge pole in the political arena. But, this got me to thinking about how often we hear lately that politicians are unwilling to make the difficult choices that will save the nation from future hardship - and it's not a problem solely found in the economy either.

Some day, feminists are going to have to be held responsible for abortion and its consequences. Not having children in society is a sure sign of an attempt to commit cultural suicide. I can't imagine history looking all too kindly at the likes of feminists such as Jennifer Wexton for being one of the enablers who supported forcing this pill of death down our throats.

Think of this. Over 50 million babies have been aborted in America since the 1970's - in general Western Civilization, who knows the number - but in all countries that have accepted and absorbed "feminist wisdom," the birthrate has plummeted, from 3.9 per couple in 1970 to 1.5 per couple today.

All of our system of expanding debt has worked over time because we had population growth, not decline. It is easier for 2 million people to pay off a billion dollar debt than it is for 1 million people. It's pretty simple math. But, when you genocide the following generations, you wind up with a bottle neck in demographics such as we have right now - a large, aging population of Boomers that cannot possibly be sustained through welfare by the smaller, younger (and genocided) generations. The "solution" progressives declare is "immigration," except, there are no Western Nations with positive birthrates, so, there is no pool of immigrants to draw from except impoverished, third-world shit-holes where people are completely foreign to our culture and our values... in other words, poor immigrants who need vast social services to educate them to even do menial tasks in society, and who will always be hostile to our general values.

Had we not aborted 1/3 of all the babies born in the past forty years, many of those 50 million aborted babies would now be adults who themselves would have reproduced... so, it is fair to say that there is around 75 million or more people missing from the American population - all homegrown, natural Americans who would be culturally in tune with greater society, and who would all be aiding in paying for the benefits the entitled Boomers voted for themselves.

Women can holler and screech about their "right" to abortion all they want... but Mother Nature doesn't care. If you want to kill your babies, don't be surprised when it comes back to haunt you with your own demise. We coulda used a good 75 million more people to help pay for all these entitlement programs, couldn't we?

We don't draft women for war and we place them on a special pedestal specifically because of their value in creating the next generation... because without the next generation, no society can survive. In fact, it makes very much sense to draft women to have babies, rather than to enable our destruction through abortion and other feminist, anti-reproduction policies. Here's something further to think about: In all of world history, not one civilization that has dropped below a birthrate of 1.9 per couple has ever reversed the situation. (Once it falls below 1.3 per couple, it is mathematically impossible to recover because of the generation gap/bottleneck). If 1/3 of all pregnancies end in abortion, then outlawing abortion would immediately sling-shot the birthrate from 1.5 per couple to 2.25 per couple, above replacement level (2.1/couple) and back on the path of life, rather than the path of cultural death.  

Probably more than anything else, feminism has been the darkest sickness of the West, because on a fundamental, it leads only to cultural death. As always, there's no such thing as a free lunch.
.

No comments:

Post a Comment