Monday, 11 September 2017

Open Borders for Hotties!

.
A freakin' decade now I've been reading this guy, and he still makes me laugh! (Although, this was a contributor's comment - the entire meme of the article is awesome!)
.
7 plus? Come on the bus!
The lower 48 need more 8s!
You’re a dime? Skip the line!
.

.
Roissy for Vice-President, 2020!
.
Now wouldn't that be something?
.

Sunday, 3 September 2017

The Tax System Explained in Beer (Or, Dear Kenny,)

.
Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100…
.
If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this…
.
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
.
The fifth would pay $1.
.
The sixth would pay $3.
.
The seventh would pay $7.
.
The eighth would pay $12.
.
The ninth would pay $18.
.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.
.
So, that’s what they decided to do..
.
The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve ball. “Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I’m going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20”. Drinks for ten men would now cost just $80.
.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share?
.
They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody’s share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.
.
So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man’s bill by a higher percentage the poorer he was, to follow the principle of the tax system they had been using, and he proceeded to work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay.
.
And so the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% saving).
.
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% saving).
.
The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% saving).
.
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% saving).
.
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% saving).
.
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% saving).
.
Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings.
.
“I only got a dollar out of the $20 saving,” declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man,”but he got $10!”
.
“Yeah, that’s right,” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a dollar too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!”
.
“That’s true!” shouted the seventh man “Why should he get $10 back, when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!”
.
“Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison, “we didn’t get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!”
.
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.
.
The next night the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had their beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn’t have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!
.
And that, boys and girls, journalists and government ministers, is how our tax system works. The people who already pay the highest taxes will naturally get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.
.
Author Unknown
.

Saturday, 2 September 2017

Good Answer

.
Made me laugh!
.
From Jim Sinclair's Mineset
.
Nugent certainly gets an A+ for correctly answering the question of the animal activist. 
. 
.
Ted Nugent, rock star and avid bow hunter from Michigan, was being interviewed by a liberal journalist who also happens to be an animal rights activist.  The discussion came around to deer hunting.  The journalist asked, “What do you think is the last thought in the head of a deer before you shoot him?  Is it, ‘Are you my friend?’ or is it ‘Are you the one who killed my brother?'”
.
Nugent replied, “Deer aren’t capable of that kind of thinking.  All they care about is what am I going to eat next, who am I going to screw next, and can I run fast enough to get away.  They are very much like the Democrats in Congress.”

The interview ended
.

Saturday, 12 November 2016

Tuesday, 8 November 2016

The Angry White Male is Trumpening His Voice!

.
Regrettfully, I have to watch American TV today, since Canadian TV is apoplectic with the idea of "The Donald."
.
Yes, my country sucks!
.
Go Donald!
.
I hope he gets the Nobel Prize for pissing off Libtards!
.
All I heard on the radio tonight was reports of faggotty SWPL declaring they will move to Canada if Trump wins...
 .
Well, you know what?
.
We've got enough libtards in this country...
.
So... we're gonna build a big wall of snow!
.
AND AMERICA IS GONNA PAY FOR IT!
.
trumplol

.

Friday, 24 June 2016

Up Yours, EU!

.
I knew there was a reason I still liked the idea of the Common-Wealth, and this is it!
.
.
Brexit as fast as you can, and don't look back, lest you turn into salt.
.

Thursday, 19 May 2016

The Rosenhan Experiment

I found this gem of a comment in an article over at Return of Kings, called "The Two Major Problems with Psychology.":

There was this one psychologist who practically debunked psychoanalysis by trolling mental institutions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Rosenhan's study was done in two parts. The first part involved the use of healthy associates or "pseudopatients" (three women and five men, including Rosenhan himself) who briefly feigned auditory hallucinations in an attempt to gain admission to 12 different psychiatric hospitals in five different states in various locations in the United States. All were admitted and diagnosed with psychiatric disorders. After admission, the pseudopatients acted normally and told staff that they felt fine and had no longer experienced any additional hallucinations. All were forced to admit to having a mental illness and agree to take antipsychotic drugs as a condition of their release. The average time that the patients spent in the hospital was 19 days. All but one were diagnosed with schizophrenia "in remission" before their release.

This is where it gets funny:

The second part of his study involved an offended hospital administration challenging Rosenhan to send pseudopatients to its facility, whom its staff would then detect. Rosenhan agreed and in the following weeks out of 193 new patients the staff identified 41 as potential pseudopatients, with 19 of these receiving suspicion from at least one psychiatrist and one other staff member. In fact, Rosenhan had sent no one to the hospital.

Tuesday, 15 December 2015

Thursday, 19 November 2015

Truth Hurts

A comment from an article at Return of Kings regarding the Paris Massacre:

Why do the French put trees alongside the road?
So the Germans can march in the shade.

Dear France.

Thank you for your help and support with the American republic back in the 1770s.
.
But it's apparent that you have all lost your marbles and, like any collapsed and weak society, are going to be overrun. Your candles and flowers vigils won't do a thing to stop the tide.
.
You know what you have to do, but you won't do it.
.
At the least your country will serve as another warning for the rest of us.
.
Meanwhile, if you want to escape to the United States, here's the best way:
- Go to Mexico
- Learn some Spanish
- Get a tan
- Sneak over the border
- Get welfare, a license, in-state tuition, everything.
.
When you get here, please do not vote the same retarded leftoidism that sent your country down the rat-hole.
.
Thank you.
.
-- America
.

Thursday, 30 July 2015

Go Donald!

.
.
Being a shaved bald guy myself, I might just buy a freakin' toupee as a symbol of solidarity with "the Donald!"
.
Give 'em hell, Donald. Speak it loud! This is EXACTLY why one needs to become a billionaire!
.

Monday, 15 June 2015

The Churchians Show Up to Defend Marriage 2.0

.
From Absolute Rights
.
"A group of Christian pastors has sent a stern warning to the nine Supreme Court justices currently considering the issue of gay marriage: You don’t have the authority – moral or otherwise – to make the determination

With the decision likely just days away, the group had gathered more than 42,000 signatures who signed a “Pledge in Solidarity to Defend Marriage,” a proclamation defending traditional marriage between one man and one woman, the Christian Post reported."
.
http://masculineprinciple.blogspot.ca/2015/03/following-masculine-principle-is-right.html
Click Pic for "Following the Masculine Principle is The Right Way"
Fair enough, marriage IS a religious institution and the government has no authority over it... BUT, if the Churchians want to defend marriage as it is defined in the Bible, then they should look at how God actually structured the institution.

Marriage 1.0 as defined by the Bible is about Patriarchy - as in, presumed father-custody of the children, rather than the presumed mother-custody that was instituted by the Suffragettes back in the mid 19th Century - and it is from this point that the divorce craze actually began, rather than with the implementation of No Fault Divorce back in the 1970's. (From 1870 to 1920, divorce rates rose from less than 2% to over 15% - a 700% increase. It has only risen about 300% since then).

Marriage as defined by God in the Bible calls for MALE leadership of the family and the submission of the wife to her husband, who in turn submits himself to God's Truths.

Defending Marriage 2.0 - ie. male and female equality in marriage Is Not Biblical. This was established way back when God cursed Adam and Eve and kicked them out of the Garden of Eden. (Adam has to work and Eve has to submit).

Sorry, Churchians, but God's form of marriage is quite clear, and the church hasn't actually "defended" marriage for the past 150 years. God's system WORKS and kept divorce rates under 2% for thousands of years. It was when we veered away from the Bible and remade marriage with presumed mother-custody that we screwed the pooch. Much like the Government, even churchians are hellbent on ignoring what God actually says.

And, btw, the Church doesn't actually "need" the government's permission to re-institute marriage. If the government has no authority over marriage in the eyes of God, it simply doesn't. All the Church really needs to restore marriage is a good old fashioned Bible and a couple pairs of hands to be placed upon it to swear out an oath before God. This is how marriage existed throughout history up until the government started to try to regulate it back in the 19th Century (they started by requiring licenses to prevent inter-racial marriages). But, to be married by the Church means you simply post the Banns in a public place for something like a week before the ceremony, and then you have the service and afterwards, the husband's and wife's names are entered into the Family Bible, and they will add the names of all the children they have into the same Family Bible. The Family Bible, btw, still holds up in a court of law for things such as inheritance between husband and wife. George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, and all the other greats from our civilization's history were both born this way and were married this way.

If the government has no authority over marriage because it is a religious institution rather than a civil one, then why ask the government for permission to practice it as is put forth in the Bible? It's foolish. Just start doing it, and never bother to obtain the government's silly marriage license. How can the government stop you from placing your hand on the Bible and swearing an oath before God that you take seriously? Wouldn't a true believer consider such an action to be more valid than the government's silly piece of paper? Any woman who married me should be tickled pink that I'd rather get married on the Bible instead of with a government piece of paper. I'd lie like a rug to the government - but I wouldn't be so quick to break an oath I swore to God.

KISS = Keep It Simple Stupid.
.